Nematicidal potential of three plant materials against Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) infestation on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

Authors

  • Ekpenyong EP College of Crop and Soil Sciences, Department of Plant Health Management, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria.
  • Ononuju CC College of Crop and Soil Sciences, Department of Plant Health Management, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria.
  • Orikara CC College of Crop and Soil Sciences, Department of Plant Health Management, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria.
  • Ikwunagu EA College of Crop and Soil Sciences, Department of Plant Health Management, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria.

Keywords:

Aspilia Africana, Cymbopogon citrates, Carbofuran, Meloidogyne incognita, Terminalia catappa

Abstract

Pot trial experiment was conducted at the College of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria between the months of June and October, 2014. The study was designed to determine; the nematicidal effect of leaf powders of Aspilia africana (African marigold), Terminalia catappa (Indian almond) and Cymbopogon citratus (Lemon grass) against nematode infestation on tomato; appropriate time of application of plant materials and to compare the effect of the plant materials with synthetic nematicide (carbofuran). The experiment consisted of six treatments with six replicates, arranged in a Completely Randomized Design. Parameters recorded were number of leaves, plant height, number of fruits, weight of fruits, fresh shoot weight, fresh root weight, number of galls in roots, number of nematodes egg in root and number of nematodes juvenile in soil. Result obtained showed that treatments at 1 and 15 days after inoculation (DAI) significantly reduced nematode population in some parameters than 30 DAI, although in some cases, there were no significant differences between treated and untreated. Thus, different powders significantly increased tomato yield when compared with untreated (nematode alone). However treatments with Aspilia africana appeared to be most effective, as it recorded least number of galls irrespective of periods of application, also for eggs in the roots and nematode juvenile in soil. Plants treated with nematicide ranked second in reducing number of galls, eggs in roots and nematode juvenile in soil. Aspilia africana performed better than Terminalia catappa and Cymbopogon citratus leaf powders, suggesting that they could be used in the management of root-knot nematodes in tomato production as alternative to chemical nematicides in view of their environmental hazard and pollution problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agbenin NO (2004) Potentials of organic amendment in the control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Plant protection Sci. 40:21-25.

Akhatar M, Alam MM (1993) Utilization of waste materials on nematode control. A review Biore. Technol 47: 1-17.

Alem MM, Siddiqui SA, Khan MA (1994) Mechanism of control of the plant parasite Nematode as a result of organ amendment to soil, III role of Phenol in host roots. Indian Journal Nematol. 7: 23-31.

Allen A (2008) “A Passion for tomato” smithsonia magazine. Pp. 26-28

Chitwood DJ (2002) Phytochemical based strategies for nematode control. Ann Rev phytopathol. 40: 221-249.

Conway G (1995) The depletion of natural resources: the impact of food. A 2020 vision for food, agriculture and the environment. International food policy research institute, Washington D.C, p 125.

Fawusi MOA (1987) Emergence and seedling growth of pepper as influence by soil compaction nutrient status and moisture regime Soc. Hortic., 9:329-335.

Fernandez C, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Warrior P, Kloeppe JW (2001) Induced soil suppressiveness to a root-knot nematode species by a nematicide. Biol. Control. 22(2):103-114.

Firoza K, Magbool MA (1996) Effect of Plants Extracts in the control of Helicotylenchus dihystera (Cobb, 1893) Sher 1961, Park, Nematol 14: 61-66.

Griffin LUS, Lin GD (2000) Hand Book on tomato production.

Hahn J, Fetzer J (2009) “Slugs in home gardens” university of Minnesota extension. Archived from the original on 2011-03-11 retrieved 23 June 2012.

Hoseinpoor R, Kargar A (2012) Evaluation of the effect powder and aqueous extracts of some plant species on tomato yield and reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita. International journal of Agric. Sci. Vol. 2(10): 964-968.

Hussey RS, Barker KR (1973) A comparison of methods of collecting inocula for Meloidogyne spp. including a new technique. Plant disease Reporter 57:1025-1028.

Javed N, Gowen SR, Inam-ul-haq M, Abdollah K, Shahina F. (2006) Systemic and persistent effect of neem (Azadirachta indica) formulations against root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne javanica and their storage life. Crop protection 26: 911-916.

Jones JB (2012) “Growing in the greenhouse” growing tomatoes. Com. Retrieved 14 August, 2012.

Kaskavalci G (2007) Effect of soil solarization and organic amendment treatments for controlling Meloidogyne incognita in tomato cultivar in Western Anatolia. Turkish Agricultural Forum 31: 159-167.

Mahovic MJ, Sargent SA, Bartz JA (2004) Identifying and Controlling Post-Harvest Tomato Disease in Florida. Publish north Carolina Co-operative Extension Service.

Mourvaki E, Gizzi S, Rossi R, Rufini S (2005) “Passion-flower fruit- A New Source of lycopene?” Journal of Medicinal food 8(1): 104-106. Doi: 10.1089/jmt. 2005. 8 104. PMID 15857218.

NRCRI (2010) National Root Crop Research Institute NRCRI Umudike Metrological Station Data, 2010.

Olson SN (2004) Physiological, Nutritional, and Other Disorders of tomato Fruit. HS-945. Horticultural sciences Department, Florida Co-operative extension services, university of Floride.

Ononuju CC (1999) Management of plant-parasitic nematode problems in commercial plantain and Banana Productions. Paper presented and the 3rd Annual conference of Agric society. Badeggi, Nigeria October 18-22.

Ononuju CC, Fawole B (2000) Evaluation of Ethoprophos Isazophos, Carbofuran for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes and their effects on plantain growth and yield. Nigerian Journal of Science 34:81-89.

Ononuju CC, Okoye CD (2003) Nematoxic activity of some common weed extracts against root-knot nematode in soyabean. Journal Agricultural and environment; Afri. Appl. 2001. Environ. Biol. 5: 64-66.

Pakeerathan K, Mikunthan G, Tharshani N (2009) Effect of different animal manures on tomato. World and Agric. Sci. 5(4): 432-435.

Saltveit ME (2003) Mature Fruit vegetable. In post-harvest physiology and pathology vegetable. J.A. Bartz and J.K. Brecht (Eds). Marcel Dekker, New York.

Singh JK, Prasad UK (2011) Crop Diseases and Control Enkay Publishing House, New Delhi India P. 123.

Sukul NC (1992) Plant antagonistic to plant parasitic nematode. Indian Rev. Life Sci. 12: 23-52.

Taniwiryono WD, Brink PVD, Rietjens IMCM, Murk AJ (2007) A case study in Bangka Island, Indonesian on the habits and consequences of pesticides use in black pepper plantations. J. Environ. Toxicd. 22(4): 405-414.

Tindall HD (2000) Vegetable in the tropics. Pp 326-327.

Trudgill DL, Phillips MS (1992) Nematode population dynamics, threshold levels and estimation of crop losses. Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Wafaa MAE, Mahmoud MAY (2013) Comparative efficacy of garlic cloves and easter seed aqueous extracts against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infection tomato. Journal of Plant Protection Research 53(3):285-288.

Yudelman M, Ratta A, Nygard D (1998) Pest Management and Food Production: Looking to the future, food, Agriculture and the environment Discussion Paper 25, International Food Policy Research Institute, USA, p. 50.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-11

How to Cite

Ekpenyong EP, Ononuju CC, Orikara CC, & Ikwunagu EA. (2016). Nematicidal potential of three plant materials against Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) infestation on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). International Journal of Life Sciences, 4(1), 22–28. Retrieved from https://ijlsci.in/ls/index.php/home/article/view/1270