Adaptations in the kidney of Palm Civet, Paradoxurus hermaphroditus (Schrater)

Authors

  • Patil Kishor G Department of Zoology, Government Institute of Science, R T Road Civil Lines, Nagpur, (M.S.) India - 440001.
  • Janbandhu Kishor S Department of Zoology, Government Institute of Science, R T Road Civil Lines, Nagpur, (M.S.) India - 440001.
  • Shende Virendra A Department of Zoology, K Z S College of Science, Bramhni, Kalmeshwar, Distt. Nagpur.
  • Ramteke Asha V Department of Zoology, S K P College, Kamtee, Distt. Nagpur.
  • Patil Megha K Plot No. 54, Old Jagruti Colony, Katol Road, Nagpur- 440013.

Keywords:

Adaptations, Palm Civet, Kidney, Uriniferous Tubule

Abstract

The kidneys of Paradoxurus hermaphroditus hermaphroditus were simple, typically bean shaped, possessing single papillary cone in the central region surrounded by thick medullary tissues. The medulla further differentiated into outer and inner regions; which was distinguished by the varying diameter and orientation of the uriniferous tubule. The outer thin cortex mainly consists of Bowman’s capsules enclosing the glomerulus and surrounded by the dense convolutions of proximal and distal tubules which were distinguished by vary in luminal diameter and the presence of microvillar brush border in the proximal tubules; the medulla is further differentiated histologically into outer and inner zones. From the outer medullary zone the large number of long medullary rays invades deep into the cortical region; sometimes up to the outer border of the kidney. The thick medulla and long medullary rays represents the long loop of Henle adapted for maximum water reabsorption and urine consentration. The distinct dense network of branches of renal vessels and the capillaries on the outer surface of kidneys indicate the rich supply to the Bowman’s capsule and increased filtration rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahams S, Greenwald L, and Stetson D (1991). Contribution of renal medullary mitochondrial density to urine concentrating ability in mammals. Amer. J. Physiol, 261:R719-R726.

Agduhr E (1917) Anatomisk studie över pelvis renalis uti nigra unipapillära i’disslarnjurar. Skand. Veterinartidskr, 7: 265.

Al-kahtani MA, Zuleta C, Caviedes-Vidal E,. Garland T Jr (2004) Kidney mass and relative medullary thickness of Rodents in relation to habitat, body size and phylogeny. Physiol. Biochem. Zool, 77(3): 346-365.

Bankir L and. de Rouffignac C (1985) Urinary concentrating ability: insights from comparative anatomy. Amer J. Physiol, 249:R643-R666.

Beuchat CA (1990) Metabolism and the scaling of urine concentrating ability in mammals: resolution of a paradox? J. Theor. Biol, 143:113-122.

Beuchat CA (1991) Body size, medullary thickness, and urine concentrating ability in mammals. Amer. J. Physiol, 258:R298-R308.

Beuchat CA (1993).The scaling of concentrating ability in mammals. In: “New Insights in Vertebrate Kidney Function”, (J. A. Brown, R.J. Balment, and J.C. Rankin, eds). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Pp 259-279.

Brownfield MS and Wunder BA (1976) Relative medullary area: a new structural index for estimating urinary concentrating capacity of mammals. Comp. Biochem. Physio, 55A:69-75.

Gerhardt U. (1911). Zur Morphologie der Säugeniere. Verh. Deut. Zool. Ges, 21:261-301.

Gottschalk WC (1987) History of the urinary concentrating mechanism. Kidney Int, 31:507-511.

Greenwald L (1989) The significance of renal relative medullary thickness. Physiol. Zool, 62:1005-1014.

Greenwald L and Stetson D (1988) Urine concentration and the length of the renal papilla. News Physiol. Sci. 3:46-49.

Patil KG and Janbandhu KS (2012) Observations on the Renal Morphology of Indian False Vampire Megaderma lyra lyra (Geoffroy). Asian Journal of Biology and Biotechnology, 1(1) e103: 1-11.

Patil KG (2013) Morphological Adaptations in the Kidney and Urine Concentrating Ability in Relation to Dietary Habit in the Three Species of Bats. World Journal of Zoology, 8(2): 198-205.

Patil KG (2014) Functional Adaptations in the Kidney of Chiropteran Hipposideros speoris (Schnider): Mammal. World Journal of Zoology, 9(1): 38-45.

Patil KG and Janbandhu KS (2011a) Protein and Glycogen Histochemistry in Prenatal and Postnatal Kidney of Rousettus leschenaulti (Desmarest) Chiroptera, Mammalia. J. Golden Research Thoughts 1(3):193-195.

Patil KG and Janbandhu KS (2011b) Carbohydrate Histochemistry in the Kidneys of Postnatal Sucklings of Indian False Vampire Megaderma lyra lyra (Geoffroy) and Indian Leaf Nosed Bat Hipposideros speoris (Schnider), Chiroptera; Mammalia. Indian Streams Research Journal, 1(10): 84-88.

Patil KG, Janbandhu KS and Ramteke AV (2010) Renal Morphology of Indian Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus hermaphroditus (Schrater) (Carnivora; Mammalia). Hislopia Journal, 3(2): 179-184.

Robson JS (1963) Factors affecting renal concentrating ability: Electron microscopic study of the kidney during antidiuresis, diuresis and potassium depletion. In “Hormones and the Kidney” (P. C. Williams, ed.), Academic Press, New York. Pp. 105-120.

Schmidt-Nielsen B and O’Dell R (1961) Strucutre and concentrating mechanism of the mammalin kidney. Amer. J. Physiol, 200:1119-1124.

Schmidt-Nielson B (1977) Excretion in mammals: Role of the renal pelvis in the modification of the urinary concentration and composition. Federation Proc, 36: 2493-2503.

Sperber I (1944) Studies on the mammalian kidney. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 22:249-431.

Vimtrup B and Schmidt-Nielsen B (1952) The histology of the kidney of the Kangaroo rat. Anat. Rec, 114:515-528.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-23

How to Cite

Patil Kishor G, Janbandhu Kishor S, Shende Virendra A, Ramteke Asha V, & Patil Megha K. (2016). Adaptations in the kidney of Palm Civet, Paradoxurus hermaphroditus (Schrater). International Journal of Life Sciences, 4(2), 198–202. Retrieved from https://ijlsci.in/ls/index.php/home/article/view/1296