Investigation of ethnic wild vegetables of Mahurgad forest, district Nanded, Maharashtra, India

Authors

  • Kahate PM Research Scholar, Department of Botany, Phulsing Naik Mahavidyalaya, Pusad, Dist. Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India
  • Chungade SM Research Supervisor, Department of Botany, Phulsing Naik Mahavidyalaya, Pusad, Dist. Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Edible’s plant, wild fruits, Mahur forest, tribal knowledge, nutrition, environmental sustainability

Abstract

This investigation was conducted in Mahur forest, district Nanded and studied on natural edible plants of Mahur forest. To collection of information using quadrate method, create quadrates on some selected villages of Mahur tahasil. Preserving knowledge about edible plant from local informants, elder people, heller, vegetable seller, middle-aged people; taking with them structure and semi structural interview and informal meeting. Collect information in local name, parts use, health benefit, recipes and their harvesting session. In this investigation collecting 35 edible plants belong to 17 family. The present study is emphasizing the need for conservation of these valuable species and combine them in to modern agricultural and dietary systems for enhancing health condition and environmental sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anonymous, Ethnobotany in India: A status report. All India coordinated research project in ethnobiology. Ministry of environment and forest, Govt. of India, New Delhi, 1995.

2. Arora and Ramawat, (2014) Biology and Biotechnology of gum yielding Indian tree: Tree Biotechnology, (https://WWW.researchgate .net/publication/300666317).

3. Barbara. M.R., Viswambharan. S., Michael. K., Eric.B., Valerie. C.,Pence.(2010),Biodiversity 47conservation and conservation biotechnology tool:springer,47:1-4.

4. Burlingame B. wild nutrition. J Food Composition Analysis. 2000; 13:99-100.

5. Fox FW and ME Norwood-Young food form the Veld. Edible wild plants of southern Africa. Delta Book, Johannesburg, South Africa. 1982.

6. Ghane SG. Lokhande., VH. Ahire., ML. Nikam TD (2010) in digofera glandulosa Wendl. (Barbada) a potential source of nutritious food: underutilized and neglected legume in India. Genet Resource crop Envol 57:147-153.

7. Guil JL., Rodriguez I., Torija ME (1997) Nutritional and toxic factors in selected wild edible plant. Foods Hum Nutr 51(2):99-107.

8. Hussain J, Hussain H., Shinwari ZK, Ahmad I, Hussain ST., Ahmad V. Antibacterial activity of the chemical constituent form Ranunculus laetus chem Nat compd. 2009;45(5):702-1.

9. ISFR-India state of forest Report (2019): Forest survey of india. Pub: ministry of Environment Forest and climate change, Vol II,349

10. IUCN ed. The 1997 IUCN red list of threatened plant. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge by the world conservation monitoring centre. International Union for the conservation of nature (IUCN): 1998:862.

11. IUCN. IUCN Read list of endangered species in: http://www.iucnredlist.org/.2010.

12. Jain S, Sinha B. Ethno botanical aspect of life support species some emergency and supplemetary foods among aboriginals in India. Life support species: Diversity and conservation, (Paroda RS, Kapoor P, Arora RK and Mal Bhag. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resource, New Delhi),1988,173-180.

13. Mithril, C., Dragsted.L.O., (2012), Safety evaluation of some wild plants in the new Nordic Diet. Food and chemical Toxicology 50,4461-4467.

14. Nilegaonkar S, Vatak V, Chitre R. Nutritional evaluation of some wild food plant form pune and nighboring districts, Maharashtra state-part-I. J. Econ.Tax. Bot. 1085; 6:629-635.

15. Rewatker V. K. (2020), India as mega biodiversity nation a fantastic ‘ethnobotanical museum’. IJRBAT,16(II):01-06.

16. Rintelen K. V., Arida E.& Hauser C. (2007) A review of biodiversity related issues and challenges in megadiverse Indonesia and other southeast Asian countries.: Res Ideas Outcomes,3(1), e2086.

17. Salvatore S., Pellegrini N., Brenna OV, Del Rio D, Frasca G, Brighenti F, Tumino R, (2005) antioxidant charactezation of some Sicilian edible wild greens. J Agric Food chem 53(24):9465-9471.

18. Sanchez M.C., Cabrera. R.D., Morales.P., Fernandez. V., Camara.M., Diez.M., pardo.M., Tardio.J.(2011), Wild vegetable of the Mediterranean as valuable sources of bioactive compound: springer science +business media B.V.2011, DOI 10.117/s10722-011-9693-6.

19. Swapnaja. D., Uday. P., Rajendra. K. (2019), Exploration and documentation of wild food plants from Satara district, Maharashtra (India): International journal of food science and nutrition, Vol 4(1),95-101.

20. Vijigiri. D & Bembrekar. S. K. (2015). Traditional knowledge of wild edible plant uses in the Mahur taluka of Nanded District, Maharashtra, India: Research direction, vol 2(9),1-5.

21. Voster.I. H. J., Jansen. V. R. W., Van. Z.J.J.B & Venter. S, (2007), The important of traditional leafy vegetable in south Africa: AJFAND, vol 7,1684-5374.

22. Wanthade. M. S., (2017). Diversity and distribution of Leguminosae tree plant in Kinwat and Mahur forest ranges of Nanded district: International journal for research in applied science & engineering technology (IJRASET), volume 5, issue Xi November,2321-9653.

23. Wehmeyer A., Rose EF. Importance indigenous plant use in the Transkei as food supplements. Bothalia. 1983; 14:613-5.

24. Word commission on environment and development. Our common future. Report of the word commission on environment and development. Oxford University press, Oxford. 1987.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Kahate PM, & Chungade SM. (2026). Investigation of ethnic wild vegetables of Mahurgad forest, district Nanded, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Life Sciences, 14(1), 33–40. Retrieved from https://ijlsci.in/ls/index.php/home/article/view/1573