Effects of cropping systems on earthworm diversity: a study

Authors

  • Anil Khole Department of Zoology, B. Raghunath ACS College, Parbhani (M.S.), India Affiliated to Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, Nanded (M.S.), India

Keywords:

Cropping system, Agricultural practices, Crop rotation, Fertilizers, Earthworm

Abstract

Earthworms are vital components of soil ecosystems, contributing to nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and overall soil fertility. Their diversity and abundance: Agricultural practices, especially cropping systems, strongly influence their diversity and abundance. by agricultural practices, particularly cropping systems. This study examines the effects of different cropping systems on earthworm diversity, highlighting how monoculture, crop rotation, and intercropping alter soil structure, organic matter availability, and microhabitat conditions. Conventional tillage management and intensive chemical inputs often reduce species richness and favour a few tolerant species, whereas conservation-oriented practices such as crop rotation, organic amendments, and reduced tillage enhance earthworm diversity and abundance. Effects of rotational cropping, agrochemicals, and tillage management on earthworm diversity are largely unknown. The objective was to learn whether long-term rotational cropping and soil management have significantly affected earthworm species and populations at study sites. The present study is an attempt to assess the earthworm abundance and diversity in rotational cropping systems under tillage management systems and exposure to agrochemicals over twelve months. Farming systems had a significant effect on bulk density in the study of the area. The findings underscore the role of earthworms as bioindicators of soil health and emphasize the necessity of sustainable cropping systems that balance agricultural productivity with biodiversity conservation. Promoting earthworm-friendly practices can improve soil strength, enhance ecosystem services, and support long-term agricultural sustainability. On the contrary, the agricultural annual cropping system did have a significant adverse effect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ashworth A.J., Allen F.L., Tyler D.D., Pote D.H. & Shipitalo M.J. (2017). Earthworm populations are affected from long-term crop sequences and bio-covers under no-tallage, Pedobiologia, Journal of Soil Ecology, 60:27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2017.01.001.

2. Awazi, N.P., Tsufac, A.R., Ambebe, T.F., Tsamo, C., Ngwabie, N.M., Enang, R.K. (2025). Agrochemical Use and Impacts on Soil Macro-Fauna and Soil Fertility in Cocoa-Based Agroforests in Cameroon. In: Agroforestry for a Sustainable Future. Palgrave Studies in Climate Resilient Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-08052-3_7.

3. Blouin, M., Hodson, M.E., Delgado, E.A., Baker, G., Brussaard, L., Butt, K.R., Dai, J., Dendooven, L., Peres, G., Tondoh, J.E., Cluzeau, D. and Brun, J.-.-J. (2013), A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services, European Journal of Soil Science, 64: 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12025.

4. Briones M.J.I., & Schmidt O. (2017). Conventional tillage decreases the abundance and biomass of earthworms and alters their community structure in a global meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol. 23: 4396–4419. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13744.

5. Borjesson, Gunnar, et al. "Seasonal dynamics of the soil microbial community: assimilation of old and young carbon sources in a long‐term field experiment as revealed by natural 13C abundance." European Journal of Soil Science, (67)1: 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12309.

6. Chan K.Y. (2001). An overview of some tillage impacts on earthworm population abundance and diversity-implications for functioning in soils, Science Direct, ELSVEIR, 57(4):179-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00173-2.

7. Christoph E., Thorsten R., Varentta A., Willy W., Thomas U. (2021). Earthworm communities are supported by perennial bioenergy cropping systems, European Journal of Soil Bioligy, ELSVEIR, 105:103331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2021.103331.

8. Desie E, Van Meerbeek K, De Wandeler H, et al. (2020). Positive feedback loop between earthworms, humus form and soil pH reinforces earthworm abundance in European forests, Funcl Ecol., British Eco. Society, 2020; 34: 2598–2610. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13668.

9. Dupouey J. L., Dambrine E, Laffite J.D. & Moares C. (2002). Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity, Ecology, 83:2978–2984. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2978:IIOPLU]2.0.CO;2.

10. Edwards C.A. & Lofty J.R. (1982). Nitrogenous fertilizers and earthworm populations in agricultural soils, Soil Biol. & Biochemistry, ELSEVEIR, 14(5):515-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(82)90112-2.

11. Ferlian, O., M. P. Thakur, A. Castañeda González, L. M. San Emeterio, S. Marr, B. da Silva Rocha, and N. Eisenhauer. (2020). Soil chemistry turned upside down: a meta-analysis of invasive earthworm effects on soil chemical properties, Ecology, 101(3):e02936. 10.1002/ecy.2936.

12. Fraser P.M., Williams P.H. & Haynes R.J. (1996). Earthworm species, population size and biomass under different cropping systems across the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand, Applied Soil Ecology, ELSEVEIR, 3(1):49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0929-1393(95)00062-3.

13. Francesca Tagliabue, Enrica Marini, Arianna De Bernardi, Costantino Vischetti, Gianluca Brunetti, Cristiano Casucci (2025). A Bioremediation and Soil Fertility Study: Effects of Verm remediation on Soil Contaminated by Chlorpyrifos, Environments, 12(5):136. 10.3390/environments12050136.

14. Kaur A., Aulakh R.K., &Rani N. (2024). Earthworm Diversity and Abundance in Various Cropping Systems under Conventional and Organic Farming, Environmental Science Archives, III (1):164-178. 10.5281/zenodo.11103687.

15. Lukas Pfiffner & Henryk Luka (2007). Earthworm populations in two low-input cereal farming systems, Applied Soil Ecology, ELSVEIR, 37(3):184-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.06.005.

16. Mitra, B. et al. (2021). Use of Agrochemicals in Agriculture: Alarming Issues and Solutions. In: Bhatt, R., Meena, R.S., Hossain, A. (eds) Input Use Efficiency for Food and Environmental Security. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5199-1_4.

17. Morten M., Till S., Ole S., Christian B., Rainer G.J. Christine W., & Mariam A. (2026). Earthworm abundance, biomass and species composition in mixed and stockless organic farming systems: evidence after a six-year crop rotation, Applied Soil Ecology, ELSVEIR, 224:107135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2026.107135.

18. Mueller, K. E., Eisenhauer, N., Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E., Chadwick, O. A., Chorover, J., Oleksyn, J. (2016). Light, earthworms, and soil resources as predictors of diversity of 10 soil invertebrate groups across monocultures of 14 tree species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 92:184–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.010.

19. Palm, C., Blanco-Canqui, H., DeClerck, F., Gatere, L., & Grace, P. (2014). Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: An overview. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187:87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.010.

20. Pelosi, C., Bertrand, M. & Roger-Estrade, J. (2009). Earthworm community in conventional, organic and direct seeding with living mulch cropping systems. Agron. Sustain. Dev. (29): 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2008069.

21. Pooja Tiwari, Azhar Rashid Lone, Shweta Yadav (2026). Invasion of Alien Earthworms: Threat to the Native Diversity of Recipient Ecosystem, Biotechnology Innovations for a Sustainable Future, 909-926. 10.1007/978-981-97-9859-9_42.

22. Rothwell, A., Chaney, K., & Haydock, P. (2011). The Impact of Cultivation Techniques on Earthworm Populations. In: Karaca, A. (eds) Biology of Earthworms. Soil Biology, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg., 24:159-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14636-7_10.

23. Sahu C., Basti S., Pradhan R.P., Sahu S.K. (2016). Physicochemical properties of soil under different land use practices located near Bhawani Patna town in Odisha, India, International Journal of Envi. Sciences, 6(6):941-953.

24. Schwarz B., Dietrich C., Cesarz S., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Auge H., Schulz E., & Eisenhauer N. (2015). Non-significant tree diversity but significant identity effects on earthworm communities in three tree diversity experiments, European Journal of Soil Biology, 67, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.01.001.

25. Schon NL., Fraser PM., & Mackay AD. (2021). Relationship between earthworm abundance, ecological diversity and soil functions in pastures. Soil Research 59, 767–777. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR20273.

26. Simone Cesarz, Nadine Fahrenholz, Sonja Migge-Kleian, Christian Platner, Matthias Schaefer (2007). Earthworm communities in relation to tree diversity in a deciduous forest, European Journal of Soil Biology, 43(1): S61-S67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.003.

27. Yvan Capowiez et al., (2009). The effect of tillage type and cropping system on earthworm communities, microporosity & water infiltration, Science Direct, ELSVEIR, 105(2):209-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.09.002.

28. Quesada, A., Sánchez‐Maeso, E., & Fernández‐Valiente, E. (1995). Seasonal variation of chemical properties of rice field soils from Valencia, Spain. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 26(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629509369276.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Anil Khole. (2026). Effects of cropping systems on earthworm diversity: a study. International Journal of Life Sciences, 14(2), 157–164. Retrieved from https://ijlsci.in/ls/index.php/home/article/view/1690