Ethnobotanical uses of plants of Mandakini valley in Rudraprayag, Uttarakhand

Authors

  • Pradeep Kumar Bhandari Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
  • Meenam Bhatia Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
  • Uniyal PL Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India

Keywords:

Endangered, Mandakini valley, Medicine, Rare, Rosaceae

Abstract

The present study describes ethnobotanical uses of plants in Mandakini valley of Rudraprayag district. Total 112 plant species in 100 genera and 63 families (both wild and cultivated) were recorded. These plants were categorised as herbs (59%), tree (28%), shrubs (10%) and climbers (3%). Ethnobotanically significant taxa were classified into eight different service categories like as medicine, edible, construction, oil, fodder, fuel, fibre and miscellaneous. The highest number of taxa (7 spp) were found of Rosaceae followed by that of Asteraceae, Lamiaceae (5 spp), Euphorbiaceae, Poaceae (4 spp), Cucurbitaceae, Solanaceae (3 spp), and Berberidaceae, Pinaceae, Adiantaceae (2 spp each). A total of 10 taxa such as Acorus calamus, Berberis chitra, Berginia straychi, Kalanchoe integra, Litsea glutinosa, Paris polyphylla, Potentilla fulgens, Satyrium nepalense, Taxus wallichiana, and Zanthoxylum armatum were observed to be of rare and endangered category, were found in the area. These plants should be conserved with sustainable management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal D P (1997) Traditional knowledge system and western science, Current Science. 73(9), 731.

Bates D M (1985) Plant utilization: Patterns and prospects, Economic Botany, 39(3), 241.

Bisht VK, Kandari LS, Negi JS, Bhandari AK, and Sundriyal RC (2013) Traditional use of medicinal plants in district Chamoli, Uttarakhand, India, Journal of plant medicinal research. 7(15), 918-929.

Charak and Drdhbala (1996) The Charak Samhita, explained by K. Sastri and G.N. Chaturvedi, edited by R Sastri, Y Upadhayaya, G S Pandeya, B Gupta and B Misra, (Chaukhamba Bharti Academy, Varanasi, 22nd Revised edition).

Dangwal LR (2010) Ethno-medicinal plants of the Garhwal Himalaya used to cure various diseases: A case study, New York science journal. 3(12), 28-31.

Frankel OH (1970) Genetic conservation of plants useful to man, Biological Conservation. 2(3), 162.

Kala CP (2004) Revitalizing traditional herbal therapy by exploring medicinal plants: A case study of Uttaranchal State in India. In Indigenous Knowledge: Transforming the Academy, Proceedings of an International Conferences Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University, 15-21.

Singh DK, Hajara PK (1996) Floristic diversity. In Biodiversity Status in the Himalaya New Delhi: Britis Council, 23-38.

Singh RV (1982) Fodder trees of India (Oxford and IBH, New Delhi).

Tulsidas (1631) Ramcharitmanas (samvat).

Uniyal B and Shiva V (2005) Traditional Knowledge on Medicinal Plants among Rural Women of the Garhwal Himalaya, Uttaranchal, Indian journal of traditional knowledge. 4(3), 259-266.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Pradeep Kumar Bhandari, Meenam Bhatia, & Uniyal PL. (2022). Ethnobotanical uses of plants of Mandakini valley in Rudraprayag, Uttarakhand. International Journal of Life Sciences, 10(3), 273–281. Retrieved from https://ijlsci.in/ls/index.php/home/article/view/645