An evaluation of comparative biosorption study of Cadmium (II) and Chromium (VI) using Orange rind (Citrus sinensis), (L.) Osbeck, under optimized conditions

Authors

  • Poojari Anukthi C Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, Department of Botany, Wilson College, Mumbai-400007,
  • Maind Sandip D Department of Chemistry, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Hazarimal Somani College of Arts and Science, Kulapati K.M. Munshi Marg, Chowpatty, Mumbai-400007, Maharashtra, India
  • Bhalerao Satish A Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, Department of Botany, Wilson College, Mumbai-400007,

Keywords:

Comparative study, Biosorption, Cadmium (II), Chromium. (VI), Orange (Citrus sinensis), (L.) Osbeck, FTIR, SEM, Adsorption isotherms, Adsorption kinetics, Thermodynamic study

Abstract

The present study investigated the comparative biosorption study of cadmium (II) and chromium (VI) using inexpensive biosorbentrind of orange (Citrus sinensis), (L.) Osbeck, under optimized conditions. A biosorption study was carried out in batch system from aqueous solutions. The biosorbent before and after biosorption was characterized by FTIR and SEM. The work considered the optimization of parameters such as solution pH, biosorbent dose, initial metal concentration, contact time and temperature. To assess the potential applicability of biosorbent, the experimental equilibrium data were analysed by Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin-Kaganer-Redushkevich (DKR) and Temkin isotherms. Langmuir isotherm model provided a better fit with the experimental data for both cadmium (II) and chromium (VI). The maximum biosorption capacity of cadmium (II) and chromium (VI) which was determined from Langmuir isotherm was found to be 83.33mgg-1and 10.74mg g-1respectively. Simple kinetic models such as pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, Elovich and Weber & Morris intraparticle rate diffusion, were employed to determine the biosorption mechanism. A result clearly indicates that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model was found to be correlating the experimental data strongest for both cadmium (II) and chromium (VI), which suggests that chemical adsorption process was more dominant. Thermodynamic study revealed that the biosorption process was spontaneous, endothermic and increasing randomness of the solid solution interfaces. The rind of orange (Citrus sinensis), (L.) Osbeck was found to remove cadmium (II) and chromium (VI) effective from aqueous solutions with uptake and selectivity in the order of cadmium (II) > chromium (VI).Thus biosorption have an advantages over other expensive cleanup technologies, can be used for waste water treatment for remediation of heavy metal contamination in industrial sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahluwalia SS and Goyal D (2007) Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Bioresour. Technol., 98:2243-2257.

Bhalerao SA (2011) Biosorption: an eco-friendly, cost effective technology for removal of heavy metals an overview. Bionano frontier, special issue, 219-225.

Catena GC and Bright FV (1989) Thermodynamic study on the effect of cyclodixtrin inclusion with anilinonaphthalenesulphonates. Anal. Chem., 61:905-909.

Chien SH and Clayton WR (1980) Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:265-268.

CiminoG and Caristi C (1990)Acute toxicity of heavy metals to aerobic digestion of waste cheese whey. Biol. Waste, 33:201-210.

Dubinin MM and Radushkevich LV (1947) Equation of the characteristic curve of activated charcoal, Proc. Academy of Sci. Phy. Chem. Section, U.S.S.R., 55:331-333.

Freundlich HMF (1906) Uber die adsorption in losungen, ZeitschriftfuePhysikalischeChemie (Leipzig), A57:385-470.

Karthikeyan S, Balasubramanian R and Iyer CSP (2007) Evaluation of marine algae Uivafasciata and Sargassum sp. for biosorption of Cu (II) from aqueous solutions. Bioresour. Technol., 98 (2): 452-455.

Kratochvil D and Volesky (1998) Advances in the biosorption of heavy metals. Trends inBiotechnology, 16(7):291-300.

Lagergren S (1898) About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble substances, KungligaSvenskaVetenskapsakademiensHandlingar.24:1-39. Langmuir I, (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surface of glass, mica and platinum, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 40:1361-1403.

Maind SD, Rathod SV, Gajbhiye S, Hile VK and Bhalerao SA (2012)Biosorption of copper (II) ions from aqueous solutions by moss (Semibarbulaorianttalis (web.) Wijk. & Marg.),Int. J. Environmental Sciences. 1(4):402-414.

Maind SD, RathodSV and Bhalerao SA (2013) Batch adsorption studies on removal of Fe (II) ions from aqueous solutions by corn cobs (Zea mays Linn.), Int. J. Chem., 2:136-148.

Maind SD,RathodSV and Bhalerao SA (2012) Biosorption of copper (II) from aqueous solutions by corn cobs. J. Biological & Physical Sciences, special issue. 1:111-115.

MaindSD and Bhalerao, SA (2013) Removal of Fe(II) ions from aqueous solutions using moss (Semibarbulaorientalis (web.) Wijk. & Marg.) in a batch system, Int. J. Biotech. Chem. & Environ. Eng. 2(2):26-35.

Malkoc E and Nuhoglu YJ (2005) Investigation of Nickel (II) removal from aqueous solutions using tea factory waste, J. Hazard. Mater. B127:120-128.

McKay G, Ho YS and Ng JCY (1999)Biosorption of copper from waste waters: A review, Sep. Purif. Methi. 28: 87-125.

Mungasavalli,DP, ViraraghavanT and JINYee-Chung (2007) Biosorption of chromium from aqueous solutions by pretreated Aspergillusniger: Batch and column studies. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical Engineering Aspects,301(1-3): 214-223.

Naiya TK, Das SK and Bhattacharya AK (2009) Adsorption of Cd (II) &Pb (II) from aqueous solution on activated alumina. J. Coll. Inter. Sci., 21: 434-451.

Olivieri NF and Brittenham GM (1997) Iron-chelating therapy and the treatment of thalassemia, Blood, 89:739-761.

Panday KK, Prasad G and Singh VN (1986) Mixed adsorbents for Cu(II) removal from aqueous solutions. Environ. Technol. Lett., 50 (7): 547-554.

Patterson JW (1985) Industrial Wastewater Treatment Technology, Butterworth Publication, Stoneham.

Perez-Marin AB, Zapata VM, Ortuno JF, Aguilarn M, SaezJ and Llorens, M (2007) Removal of cadmium by aqueous solutions by adsorption onto orange waste. J. Hazard. Mater.,139:22-131.

Pino GH,Souza de Messquita LM, ToremML and Pinto GA (2006) Biosorption of cadmium by green coconut shell powder. J. Minerals Eng. 19:380-387.

Rao PS, Mise RS and Munjunatha GS (1992) Kinetic studies on adsorption of chromium by coconut shell carbons from synthetic effluents. J. Environ. Sci. Health A, 27: 2227-2241.

Sawalha MF, Peralta-Videa JR, Romero-Gonzalez J and Gardea-Torresdey JL (2006)Biosorption of Cd(II), Cr(III) and Cr (VI) by saltbush (Atriplexcanescens) biomass : Thermodynamic and isotherm studies, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 300:100-104.

Septhum C, Rattanaphani S, Bremner JB and Rattanaphani V (2007) An adsorption of Al (III) ions onto chitosan. J. Hazardous Materials. 148:185-191.

Sharma YC (2008) Thermodynamics of removal of cadmium by adsorption on indigenous clay. Chem. Eng. J., 145:64-68.

Temkin MJ and Pyzhev V (1940) Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalysts, ActaPhysiochim. Urrs, 12:217-222.

Thomas JM and Thomas WJ (1997) Principle and Practice of heterogeneous catalysis, weinheim, VCH.

Volesky B (2013) Sorption and biosorption. Montreal-St. Lambert, Quebec, Canada, BV Sorbex Inc. 316.

Weber WJ and Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon solution. J. SanitEng. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Engg. 89: 31-59.

WHO (3rd ed.), (2008) Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality: Recommendations, World Health Organization Geneva, Vol 1.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-11

How to Cite

Poojari Anukthi C, Maind Sandip D, & Bhalerao Satish A. (2016). An evaluation of comparative biosorption study of Cadmium (II) and Chromium (VI) using Orange rind (Citrus sinensis), (L.) Osbeck, under optimized conditions. International Journal of Life Sciences, 4(1), 44–56. Retrieved from https://ijlsci.in/ls/index.php/home/article/view/1272